3863
%
It is expedient to transmit for Your Lordship's information the actual application (14 July) which I received from the Chief Justice on the subject, also my reply thereto, in which I availed myself of the opportunity to convey to him your Lordship's decision on several points raised in a former correspondence. Vide Gov to S. S. No 483.
5850
The subject of his letter including the 34 April 1869 interpretation of his powers under the Summary Court Ordinance (No 7 of 1862).
2
As Mr Smale, in acknowledging that letter, speaks of there being so able a Bar practising here at present that in making the arrangements necessary to surmount the difficulties caused by the absence of the Chief Justice and the Judge of the Summary Court at the same time, it would be an embarrassment of choice only. I take the liberty of remarking that there is little foundation for such an extraordinary statement.
3. Including Mr Hallyar, a new addition to the Bar, there are only three practising Barristers here besides the Attorney General, and as two absent judges have to be provided for, the very important duties of the Attorney General have to be provided for by appointments from those four Barristers, whilst some counsel must be left available for the Public. I submit that the assertion of the Chief Justice is entirely opposed to...
3863
%
it expedient to transmit for Your Lordolipio information the actual application (14 July) which I received from the Chief Justice
on the subject, also my reply thereto. in which I availed myself of
the opportunity to convey to him your
Lordship's
decision om
several points
raised in a former correspondense
Jon
Vide Gov to 8. S. Ne 483.
5850
; the subject of his leave including the 34 april 1869 interpretation of his pawers under the
Summary bourt, Ordinance (N=7 of 1862).
2
As Mr Smale in acknowledging that letter speats of there being so able a Bar practising here at present that in making the arrangements merepary to
difficulties caused
caused by the
surmount the
absence of the Chief Justice and the
judge of the Summary bount at the same time it would be an imbanafoment of choice only. I take the liberty of
mo
remarking that there is literally foundation for such an extraordinary
statement
3. Including Mr Hallyar
a new
addition to the Bar there are only three
practising Barristers here besides the Attorney General, and as two absent judges
Cus
the duties of
well
aus
the
very
important duties of the Attorney General have to be provided for by appointments hom those four Barristers, whilst some bounsel must be left available for the Public I submit that the apertion of the lakief justice is entirely apposed to
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.